Just when we think that rules will not change and we have an understanding of income taxes assessed on trusts and estates, the courts have thrown yet another curve in the calculation of deductible expenses.
In January, the United States Supreme Court, which does not normally review many tax related cases, made a unanimous decision that investment advisory fees paid by a trust may not be deducted in full for income tax purposes. Therefore, these expenses may be subject to a 2% limitation as part of the itemized miscellaneous deductions claimed on a fiduciary tax return.
In the case they reviewed, there was a trust established under the will of the founder of the Pepperidge Farm Company. This particular trust had almost $3 million in securities and paid approximately $22,000 in investment advisory fees. While the trust deducted all fees, the Internal Revenue Service felt that these fees should be subject to the 2% floor and thus disallowed a significant portion of them.
Therefore, the IRS felt that the trust owed an additional $4,448 in taxes. The trust position held that there was a fiduciary duty upon the trustee to act under the prudent investor rule in Connecticut, and therefore, was required to engage investment counsel to provide for investment advisory expense, which was deductible.
Without getting into the arguments that both parties made, the court determined that it was not uncommon for an individual to hire an investment advisor, and therefore, the prudent investment standard does not only apply to trustees.
The standard is what a prudent investor, with the same investment objectives, handling the investors own affairs, would do. Since there may not be a difference between investment advisory fees for an individual versus a trustee, the fees will be subject to the 2% floor, and therefore, not fully deductible.
In most trusts this may not be a major issue, but for a large trust with large investment advisory fees, this will cause additional taxes to be due, and thus, a trustee should in fact be filing larger estimated tax payments to avoid a penalty in the future. This is a situation that certainly involves an accountant who is skilled in fiduciary taxes to properly complete returns and ensure that all maximum deductions are obtained correctly.
By: Hyman G. Darling, Esq.