Under the 2005 Amendments to the Bankruptcy Code, Congress instituted a Means Test to determine whether filing Chapter 7 was presumed to be abusive. As part of the test, the debtor is initially required to compare the income of their family to the median income of a similarly sized family for the state in which the debtor resides. If the income is less than the median income, the Chapter 7 filing is presumed to be non-abusive.
For example, in Massachusetts, the median income for a family of one is $54,842, compared to a family of three which is $83,104. Thus if the debtor earns $83,000, they are initially eligible to file a Chapter 7 if their family is reported as three, however they are not eligible if the family size is one or two.
The key issue then becomes how to determine household size. For example, if the Debtor is a single parent without physical custody of their two kids, can they claim a household size of three based on the fact child support is being paid, despite the fact the children do not reside with the debtor? Simply put, the larger the household size, the easier it is to pass the means test.
Unfortunately, the IRS and Census Bureau definitions differ on the concept of family size. Some Courts have adopted the Census Bureau definition described as a “heads on beds” definition in that anyone actually sleeping and eating in the house is a household member. Other Courts are more concerned with whether the debtor is financially supporting others, regardless of where they actually live. In short, the more evidence a debtor can show that someone is a family member that they care for and that resides with them, the more likely the debtor will be able to include them as household members and ultimately become eligible to file bankruptcy.
By: Justin H. Dion, Esq.